I realize that most of you probably aren't interested in this issue, but take my word for it that this is a important test for the rule of law in this country. The Republicans are going to force a vote on a permanent FISA bill, and Harry Reid has determined to bring to the floor a bill containing the provisions for immunity for companies that participated in warrantless surveillance. The legality of this issue should be decided in a courtroom, not in Congress. This measure would effectively strip citizens of their right to redress in a court of law.
Those of us who oppose this measure have an ally in Sens. Dodd and Feingold. But we need more. Dodd was drafted into the movement by concerned citizens. Now, an attempt is being made to add another champion to our ranks: former Senator John Edwards. The folks at Firedoglake have more on this. Take the time to click on the link and write John Edwards an email requesting his leadership.
**UPDATE**
Harry Reid has thrown down the gauntlet to the opponents of telecom immunity.
Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Telecom Immunity Update **UPDATED**
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Is this related to the patriot act and such?
No, this is a separate issue. The surveillance at issue here was not condoned by any law. FISA was developed in response to abuses w/ respect to surveillance that occurred during the Nixon administration. It expressly requires agents to seek a warrant for any surveillance activity involving American citizens. The only warrantless surveillance allowed is against foreign governments and agents, and when there is a "substantial likelihood" that the communications of US citizens won't be involved. President Bush authorized surveillance of US citizens without warrants. He and others in the administration have admitted as much.
Post a Comment